limate change policies will fail unless women have greater influence over decisions, from where to build wells to how to negotiate a global deal

Women and children are 14 times more likely to die than men during natural disasters, according to UN Women. (Image by Rajkumar1220)
The impacts of climate change will disproportionately affect people living in poverty in poorer countries, notwithstanding their minimal per-capita contributions to greenhouse-gas emissions. It’s here where the damage will be greatest and where people have the lowest capacity to cope.
According to UN Women, some 70% of people in the developing world living below the poverty threshold are women, yet gender issues receive little attention in the climate-change debate. People are vulnerable to the hazards of climate change to a greater or lesser degree depending on factors such as their wealth, education, skills, management capability and access to technology, infrastructure and information. Women’s access to these resources is often inferior to that of men, and this increases their vulnerability and limits their ability to cope with the advent of climate shocks and to recover when they have passed.
These gender-related inequalities are particularly pervasive in the developing world. Women and children are 14 times more likely to die than men during natural disasters. More than 70% of the dead from the Asian tsunami were women; roughly 87% of unmarried women and 100% of married women lost their main source of income when Cyclone Nargis hit the Ayeyarwaddy Delta in Myanmar in 2008.
In Bangladesh, social prejudice keeps girls and women from learning to swim and climb trees. Many women cannot leave their homes without accompaniment or consent from their husband or one of their male relatives. Men can more easily warn each other as they meet in public spaces, but they rarely communicate information to the rest of the family. As a result, far more women than men perish in the major floods which characterise life in the coastal areas of Bangladesh. When a cyclone and floods hit Bangladesh in 1991, the death rate for women was almost five times higher than for men.
Research by the London School of Economics found that in a sample of 141 countries over the period 1981–2002, natural disasters (and their subsequent impact) killed on average more women than men, and killed women at an earlier age than men. Boys were more likely to receive preferential treatment in rescue efforts, and women and children suffered more from food shortages and a lack of privacy and safety in the aftermath of disasters.
In India, various studies have shown that over the past decade more women than men have suffered from premature deaths on account of heatwaves and cold snaps and other climate-related extreme events. Following extreme events such as storms and floods, the burden of devastation also falls primarily on women, who must keep the family together.
Changing weather patterns could affect farming activities such as paddy cultivation in Asia, and cash crops such as cotton and tea, the cultivation of which employs many women. In Africa, for example, women contribute to 70% of food production; they account for nearly half of all farm labour and 80–90% of food processing. Wangari Maathai acknowledged this when she received the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo on 10 December, 2004, describing Africa’s women as “the primary caretakers, holding significant responsibility for tilling the land and feeding their families”.
In Bangladesh, women and children provide nearly all household water in rural areas, both for domestic use such as drinking, cooking, bathing and washing, and for irrigating gardens and watering livestock. The intrusion of saltwater into freshwater resources in the districts of Satkhira, Khulna and Bagerhat on the south-western coast of Bangladesh is already having a disproportionate impact on women, particularly during the dry season. Because nearly all local water sources have high salinity, women must travel long distances by foot every day to find drinking water, even if they are in poor health.
Ensuring greater gender equality will benefit society as a whole and help promote sustainable development. However, getting gender issues into debates on climate change and sustainable development is happening piecemeal, extremely slowly and often as an afterthought.
This is in part due to the lack of participation by women in decision-making at all levels. In the Kilombera district in Tanzania, for example, a newly constructed well dried up. Its location had been determined by an all-male local committee, despite the fact that it was the task of local women to dig for water by hand as they know the most likely places to find water. By the same token, at the international climate-change negotiations in 2010, women made up only 30% of negotiators and just 10% of heads of delegations.
This lack of representation must change, because climate-change policies will be unsuccessful if women have no opportunity to influence decision-making, build their capacity, lower their vulnerability and diversify their income sources. In India, for example, women have played a huge role in improving the public service health sector. A 1992 constitutional amendment mandated the reservation of one-third of panchayat (local government) seats for women. Since then, relative spending on public water and latrines for low-caste communities has increased.
Special attention needs to be paid to the opportunities arising from international climate-change negotiations. Many emerging solutions intended to help people cope with climate change involve land use and agriculture in rural areas, a key sector for women.
The dependence of women on biomass energy – for example, burning wood for household cooking – means that they should also be involved in projects promoting renewable-energy resources. In El Salvador and Guatemala the primary source of fuel is wood, and it is the job of women and girls to gather it. Many spend as much as three or four hours, three to five times a week, searching for wood. And when they cook food for their households, they are exposed to toxic cooking smoke.
Agencies promoting clean, renewable energy, such as solar ovens, have found it vital to target groups of women, who can learn from one another whilst practising the new technologies. Despite this, men often influence the uptake of new-energy technologies in this domain too. In one case in Zimbabwe, men are reported to have rejected the use of solar cookers by their wives, since technology and its development are seen traditionally as a male preserve.
This piece was first published by www.chinadialogue.net. It is an edited extract from the book Climate Change and Human Development (Zed Books, 2014) by Hannah Reid
The report that man is likely to get preferential treatment than women in rescue effort is absolutely wrong according to me. Whether it is in film or in real life scene, I’ve always found that the rescuer give first priority to children, then women and then in last, men in any rescue mission or task.
Climate Change does not belong to any gender. It is going to affect all equally as per the nature. If a person is weak, he or she is going to be affected more. If there is flood, any person, whether a woman or man or child who is weak and does not know how to swim is more likely to get drown! What is and where is the question then? When lions chases buffaloes, it will target the weakest among the group, usually young one and females. Are we going to say that buffaloes are gender bias or lions are the culprit? It is wrong to debate who is bias or culprit. The right way of debate is how to ensure lions does not chases buffaloes! Now, the debate should be how the deterioration in environment can be checked instead of debating who should do. If men can do let him and if women can then let her! In a society, role of man and woman is fixed and accordingly their responsibilities, whether it is climate change or any other matters, is fixed. Man is stronger than woman, so his duty is to give protection in terms of economy, political or physical. Women are more gentle and caring and weaker, she is a perfect home maker. It is naturally determined duties as per the nature of male or female. It is not only in the case of human but also in case of other animals too. Should we, in the name of gender equality, withdraw all men soldiers, bring them to cook food and send all women folks to guard the borders? It is hilarious even to think in that way! Women and children has been always loved and cared by men. So they have been protected and confined to the security of home while men himself ventured out for the family survival exposing himself to danger. By and by through the ages, this had become a social practice although the situation become changed and improved especially in terms of security as men learned to make laws. Now women needs less security and can also venture out like man and hence she feels suffocated in confinement of home. She also wants some tough job like man and to share some responsibility. That is absolutely right and society must move ahead with changing time. We must make adjustments in social set up and religious beliefs regarding women’s responsibilities as time has changed. Women are not that vulnerable as it used to be in olden days. That is the right way of debate. ..not that man and women are equal…gender equality. ..and blah blah … Can a woman father a child or can a man mother a child? Or can a woman urinate in standing position without wetting her pant if she is equal to man? Man can easily urinate without wetting his pant in standing position. We must understand and respect what nature has bestowed to us.
Now entire debate or approach to climate change appears absured to me. In one such conference on CC, one expert explained to me about Adaptation Measure. I told him that I have cut down 1000 trees and water supply to my house has also gone down 1000 litres. What should I do? He told me that in Adaptation Measure, You should use less water, curtail daily consumption rate, use water judiciously. I again asked him that if tomorrow I cut down 1000000 trees and there is no water supply to my house, then what should I do in Adaptation Measure? He told me ” in adaptation measure, either you don’t drink water or shift your village”. I asked him ” where do I shift my village?” He said “I don’t know. This is Adaptation Strategy”.
Now tell me.. If I am not to shift my village, should no I either not cut down trees or replant the depleted forest? What the hell this Adaptation Measure is to do with if Climate Change has to be checked? Is not our approach wrong? …. These are the issues…
Dear Egam Basar,
I have two questions for you. Did you read the article? Did you read your comment before posting it?
I have no idea about your gender but you seem to be having a very sexist attitude that men are powerful and superior to women.The author clearly mentions statistics on how women have died in large numbers in every disaster over decades. Women have not been involved in decision making over years and so it is necessary for their involvement to maintain that balance which you conveniently ignore and go into prehistoric era of man going to hunt. Women are the ones who care for children and carry them most of the time and end up being the most vulnerable. Women can and do anything including fight in army and dude seriously which generation are you from to think men dont have to cook!!!
And regarding your comment on adaptation. If you cut down 1000 trees and realize your water has come down, you cut down your consumption and look at ways of harvesting water instead of cutting down all the trees and moving to a different place. The expert on adaptation in the workshop must have found your argument silly and must have skipped your question unlike me who is taking time in responding for which you should technically thank me.
I am not even going to respond too your comments on lions, men protecting women and women standing and peeing, read them once yourself and you will understand why I don’t want to waste my time in commenting.
The problem with you is that you are not trying to understand, you are just trying to reply and get into an argument.
Regards
Rakesh
Unelralapled accuracy, unequivocal clarity, and undeniable importance!